midsouthracing.com Forum Index
Comp Cams
TCI
Dirty Girl Racewear Dirt Heads Crowley's Ridge Raceway
I-30 New Vision Your Ad
Your Ad George Kell Sign Co. Smileys Racing Products

 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in  Subscribe 
 

Let's try to understand this thing
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    midsouthracing.com Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
NeverTrustAMidget



Joined: 06 Oct 2007
Posts: 13498

PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2018 1:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Excavator wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
Still waiting on Midge to tell us how many days the GOP was willing to let Scalia's seat stay open.


Do not answer apples and oranges questions. To do so would legitimize your illegitimate argument.


The GOP proved they are willing to wait a REALLY long time for a SCOTUS judge confirmation in the name of "Politics". That seat would still be vacant had Hillary won the election. Now, the GOP is trying to rush an appointment in the name of "politics". LOL You clowns are beyond predictable.


The GOP Has not rushed. The confirmation process has run it's intended course. Politics is always the leading factor, but the fact is that Judge kavanaugh is more than qualified to fill the seat. The last minute hail Mary with the fake plant will fail, and kavanaugh will be confirmed.


But you really have to laugh about things. Woman says he attacked me and shouldn't be on bench. Yet when given opportunity to go before the committees and testify about what happened she continues to hee and haw and ask for this situation or that situation before she will testify.

Not only does she want to pick the day she testifies, but who asks her questions and the scheduled of the day for all the proceedings and who else will testify that day. If this was a legitimate witness she would t4estify when the committee wanted and she would answer all questions from all committee members.

Committee should tell her here is the date you will testify and you will be face questions from every member of committee who wants to ask you a question. If not then we will continue without your input.
_________________
,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Porkchop



Joined: 14 Oct 2005
Posts: 2173
Location: Hot Springs

PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2018 8:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/23/fox-news-poll-record-number-voters-oppose-kavanaugh-nomination.html
_________________
Left leaning Moderate
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PV=nRT



Joined: 14 Jun 2012
Posts: 3921

PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2018 9:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Excavator wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
Still waiting on Midge to tell us how many days the GOP was willing to let Scalia's seat stay open.


Do not answer apples and oranges questions. To do so would legitimize your illegitimate argument.


The GOP proved they are willing to wait a REALLY long time for a SCOTUS judge confirmation in the name of "Politics". That seat would still be vacant had Hillary won the election. Now, the GOP is trying to rush an appointment in the name of "politics". LOL You clowns are beyond predictable.


The GOP Has not rushed. The confirmation process has run it's intended course. Politics is always the leading factor, but the fact is that Judge kavanaugh is more than qualified to fill the seat. The last minute hail Mary with the fake plant will fail, and kavanaugh will be confirmed.


But you really have to laugh about things. Woman says he attacked me and shouldn't be on bench. Yet when given opportunity to go before the committees and testify about what happened she continues to hee and haw and ask for this situation or that situation before she will testify.

Not only does she want to pick the day she testifies, but who asks her questions and the scheduled of the day for all the proceedings and who else will testify that day. If this was a legitimate witness she would t4estify when the committee wanted and she would answer all questions from all committee members.

Committee should tell her here is the date you will testify and you will be face questions from every member of committee who wants to ask you a question. If not then we will continue without your input.


She is asking for a legitimate investigation, which is what should be done to find the facts in this case. These Senate committee's are a joke, as both sides have already made up their minds minus any facts. Is there any reason why you are opposed to a legitimate investigation?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Excavator



Joined: 22 May 2012
Posts: 3169
Location: Benton, Arkansas

PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2018 10:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Porkchop wrote:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/23/fox-news-poll-record-number-voters-oppose-kavanaugh-nomination.html


If these polls were accurate, Hillary Clinton would be president. Fox News also had Clinton easily winning the presidential election.
_________________
IN GOD WE TRUST!
All others must sign an affidavit...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Excavator



Joined: 22 May 2012
Posts: 3169
Location: Benton, Arkansas

PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2018 11:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Excavator wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
Still waiting on Midge to tell us how many days the GOP was willing to let Scalia's seat stay open.


Do not answer apples and oranges questions. To do so would legitimize your illegitimate argument.


The GOP proved they are willing to wait a REALLY long time for a SCOTUS judge confirmation in the name of "Politics". That seat would still be vacant had Hillary won the election. Now, the GOP is trying to rush an appointment in the name of "politics". LOL You clowns are beyond predictable.


The GOP Has not rushed. The confirmation process has run it's intended course. Politics is always the leading factor, but the fact is that Judge kavanaugh is more than qualified to fill the seat. The last minute hail Mary with the fake plant will fail, and kavanaugh will be confirmed.


But you really have to laugh about things. Woman says he attacked me and shouldn't be on bench. Yet when given opportunity to go before the committees and testify about what happened she continues to hee and haw and ask for this situation or that situation before she will testify.

Not only does she want to pick the day she testifies, but who asks her questions and the scheduled of the day for all the proceedings and who else will testify that day. If this was a legitimate witness she would t4estify when the committee wanted and she would answer all questions from all committee members.

Committee should tell her here is the date you will testify and you will be face questions from every member of committee who wants to ask you a question. If not then we will continue without your input.


Is there any reason why you are opposed to a legitimate investigation?


Because it does not appear to be a legitimate claim. Ford's claim is from 36 years ago. It appears to be a claim simply to delay, and bring down Kavanaugh. There's no proof. It was put out there at the last possible moment. Ford is one woman who is a liberal, democrat activist (are there no others?). There are a hundred other women who have already vouched for kavanaugh's integrity. The investigation down the road may be the one to determine if Ford pulled this on her own, or if she was coaxed into it by the powers that be on the left. I can't say I'm surprised by this attempt to stop Judge Kavanaugh because liberal progressives are in danger of losing the supreme court for a generation. Abortion, gun control & immigration just for starters. #dukelacrosse

Again, why the silence on Keith Ellison, and Cory Booker?
_________________
IN GOD WE TRUST!
All others must sign an affidavit...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
STRONGERTHANDIRT



Joined: 18 Aug 2018
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2018 11:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Erick Ericson pretty much summed it up this week on his radio show... this is about Roe vs. Wade and the lefts ability to kill babies, his words not mine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Excavator



Joined: 22 May 2012
Posts: 3169
Location: Benton, Arkansas

PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2018 4:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JamieHall wrote:
It's funny to watch you people act like this wouldn't have happened if the roles were reversed with the libs and cons -- because it already has plenty of times. It's politics as usual, and not even King Donald can change that.


When have republicans tried to use a FAKE sexual assault plot to delay, or stop a supreme court appointment? We've seen this before. This is a democrat tactic. I understand forcing delays, and fighting court appointments, but this plot with Ford is lower than a snake's belly.

I believe there WILL be damning information come to light on this plot in the coming days.
_________________
IN GOD WE TRUST!
All others must sign an affidavit...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NeverTrustAMidget



Joined: 06 Oct 2007
Posts: 13498

PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2018 4:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Excavator wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
Still waiting on Midge to tell us how many days the GOP was willing to let Scalia's seat stay open.


Do not answer apples and oranges questions. To do so would legitimize your illegitimate argument.


The GOP proved they are willing to wait a REALLY long time for a SCOTUS judge confirmation in the name of "Politics". That seat would still be vacant had Hillary won the election. Now, the GOP is trying to rush an appointment in the name of "politics". LOL You clowns are beyond predictable.


The GOP Has not rushed. The confirmation process has run it's intended course. Politics is always the leading factor, but the fact is that Judge kavanaugh is more than qualified to fill the seat. The last minute hail Mary with the fake plant will fail, and kavanaugh will be confirmed.


But you really have to laugh about things. Woman says he attacked me and shouldn't be on bench. Yet when given opportunity to go before the committees and testify about what happened she continues to hee and haw and ask for this situation or that situation before she will testify.

Not only does she want to pick the day she testifies, but who asks her questions and the scheduled of the day for all the proceedings and who else will testify that day. If this was a legitimate witness she would t4estify when the committee wanted and she would answer all questions from all committee members.

Committee should tell her here is the date you will testify and you will be face questions from every member of committee who wants to ask you a question. If not then we will continue without your input.


She is asking for a legitimate investigation, which is what should be done to find the facts in this case. These Senate committee's are a joke, as both sides have already made up their minds minus any facts. Is there any reason why you are opposed to a legitimate investigation?


No she isn't. The FBI does not have the authority to investigate an alleged State criminal act. If she really wanted the facts to be found out she would have asked the state criminal justice system to investigate sometime in the past 36 years. She is a radical at U of Cal and is willing to do or say anything to push an agenda. SHE DOES NOT WANT AN OPEN INVESTIGATION. Just like she does not want to testify in front of the committee without protection from being charged with perjury.

This isn't a background check which the FBI has done on almost every appointed. It would be a criminal investigation and the FBI does not have the authority to investigate an alleged state crime.

As we have seen already this FBI cannot be trusted to investigate a jay walking incident.
_________________
,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PV=nRT



Joined: 14 Jun 2012
Posts: 3921

PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 7:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Excavator wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
Still waiting on Midge to tell us how many days the GOP was willing to let Scalia's seat stay open.


Do not answer apples and oranges questions. To do so would legitimize your illegitimate argument.


The GOP proved they are willing to wait a REALLY long time for a SCOTUS judge confirmation in the name of "Politics". That seat would still be vacant had Hillary won the election. Now, the GOP is trying to rush an appointment in the name of "politics". LOL You clowns are beyond predictable.


The GOP Has not rushed. The confirmation process has run it's intended course. Politics is always the leading factor, but the fact is that Judge kavanaugh is more than qualified to fill the seat. The last minute hail Mary with the fake plant will fail, and kavanaugh will be confirmed.


But you really have to laugh about things. Woman says he attacked me and shouldn't be on bench. Yet when given opportunity to go before the committees and testify about what happened she continues to hee and haw and ask for this situation or that situation before she will testify.

Not only does she want to pick the day she testifies, but who asks her questions and the scheduled of the day for all the proceedings and who else will testify that day. If this was a legitimate witness she would t4estify when the committee wanted and she would answer all questions from all committee members.

Committee should tell her here is the date you will testify and you will be face questions from every member of committee who wants to ask you a question. If not then we will continue without your input.


She is asking for a legitimate investigation, which is what should be done to find the facts in this case. These Senate committee's are a joke, as both sides have already made up their minds minus any facts. Is there any reason why you are opposed to a legitimate investigation?


No she isn't. The FBI does not have the authority to investigate an alleged State criminal act. If she really wanted the facts to be found out she would have asked the state criminal justice system to investigate sometime in the past 36 years. She is a radical at U of Cal and is willing to do or say anything to push an agenda. SHE DOES NOT WANT AN OPEN INVESTIGATION. Just like she does not want to testify in front of the committee without protection from being charged with perjury.

This isn't a background check which the FBI has done on almost every appointed. It would be a criminal investigation and the FBI does not have the authority to investigate an alleged state crime.

As we have seen already this FBI cannot be trusted to investigate a jay walking incident.


Lol. Why are you so opposed to finding out the truth? What's the hurry with this nomination? You clowns have already proven that you are willing to let SCOTUS seats sit vacant for years. You bypassed a legitimate nomination with some fabricated BS and even changed the rules with number of votes needed for confirmation. But now you want to rush a vote without properly confirming/refuting the authenticity of allegations. What you are seeing now is the backlash from the Garland nomination. We were at one time all Americans, but we have now been divided into tribes. Just look at how pathetic you have become, as a "Christian Conservative" who supports the antics of a man like Trump. You guys are so broken.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Keith Stone



Joined: 24 Dec 2010
Posts: 107

PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 8:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Excavator wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
Still waiting on Midge to tell us how many days the GOP was willing to let Scalia's seat stay open.


Do not answer apples and oranges questions. To do so would legitimize your illegitimate argument.


The GOP proved they are willing to wait a REALLY long time for a SCOTUS judge confirmation in the name of "Politics". That seat would still be vacant had Hillary won the election. Now, the GOP is trying to rush an appointment in the name of "politics". LOL You clowns are beyond predictable.


The GOP Has not rushed. The confirmation process has run it's intended course. Politics is always the leading factor, but the fact is that Judge kavanaugh is more than qualified to fill the seat. The last minute hail Mary with the fake plant will fail, and kavanaugh will be confirmed.


But you really have to laugh about things. Woman says he attacked me and shouldn't be on bench. Yet when given opportunity to go before the committees and testify about what happened she continues to hee and haw and ask for this situation or that situation before she will testify.

Not only does she want to pick the day she testifies, but who asks her questions and the scheduled of the day for all the proceedings and who else will testify that day. If this was a legitimate witness she would t4estify when the committee wanted and she would answer all questions from all committee members.

Committee should tell her here is the date you will testify and you will be face questions from every member of committee who wants to ask you a question. If not then we will continue without your input.


She is asking for a legitimate investigation, which is what should be done to find the facts in this case. These Senate committee's are a joke, as both sides have already made up their minds minus any facts. Is there any reason why you are opposed to a legitimate investigation?


No she isn't. The FBI does not have the authority to investigate an alleged State criminal act. If she really wanted the facts to be found out she would have asked the state criminal justice system to investigate sometime in the past 36 years. She is a radical at U of Cal and is willing to do or say anything to push an agenda. SHE DOES NOT WANT AN OPEN INVESTIGATION. Just like she does not want to testify in front of the committee without protection from being charged with perjury.

This isn't a background check which the FBI has done on almost every appointed. It would be a criminal investigation and the FBI does not have the authority to investigate an alleged state crime.

As we have seen already this FBI cannot be trusted to investigate a jay walking incident.


Lol. Why are you so opposed to finding out the truth? What's the hurry with this nomination? You clowns have already proven that you are willing to let SCOTUS seats sit vacant for years. You bypassed a legitimate nomination with some fabricated BS and even changed the rules with number of votes needed for confirmation. But now you want to rush a vote without properly confirming/refuting the authenticity of allegations. What you are seeing now is the backlash from the Garland nomination. We were at one time all Americans, but we have now been divided into tribes. Just look at how pathetic you have become, as a "Christian Conservative" who supports the antics of a man like Trump. You guys are so broken.


As too are you Sir........both sides are broken in some form or another. I know Democrats don't like to look at history, because it exposes their radical form of thinking. But, all you have to do is look at the Democrat behavior in 1992 and 2003. In 1992 the "Biden rule" came about.....he went to the floor of the Senate stated that the President should not nominate a Justice in an election year. Then, in 2016 the Democrats went against there on thought process and nominated Mr. Garland.....the Republicans simply followed the "Biden Rule". Additionally, 1992 and 2016 were Presidential Election years, not mid-terms as we are currently in.....there is a big difference. 2003 shows how sneaky the Democrats are as they pulled out all the stops to ruin Miguel Estrada......which they ultimately did. Dispute it if you will, but these are the facts......and it is sad to say the least.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PV=nRT



Joined: 14 Jun 2012
Posts: 3921

PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 9:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Keith Stone wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Excavator wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
Still waiting on Midge to tell us how many days the GOP was willing to let Scalia's seat stay open.


Do not answer apples and oranges questions. To do so would legitimize your illegitimate argument.


The GOP proved they are willing to wait a REALLY long time for a SCOTUS judge confirmation in the name of "Politics". That seat would still be vacant had Hillary won the election. Now, the GOP is trying to rush an appointment in the name of "politics". LOL You clowns are beyond predictable.


The GOP Has not rushed. The confirmation process has run it's intended course. Politics is always the leading factor, but the fact is that Judge kavanaugh is more than qualified to fill the seat. The last minute hail Mary with the fake plant will fail, and kavanaugh will be confirmed.


But you really have to laugh about things. Woman says he attacked me and shouldn't be on bench. Yet when given opportunity to go before the committees and testify about what happened she continues to hee and haw and ask for this situation or that situation before she will testify.

Not only does she want to pick the day she testifies, but who asks her questions and the scheduled of the day for all the proceedings and who else will testify that day. If this was a legitimate witness she would t4estify when the committee wanted and she would answer all questions from all committee members.

Committee should tell her here is the date you will testify and you will be face questions from every member of committee who wants to ask you a question. If not then we will continue without your input.


She is asking for a legitimate investigation, which is what should be done to find the facts in this case. These Senate committee's are a joke, as both sides have already made up their minds minus any facts. Is there any reason why you are opposed to a legitimate investigation?


No she isn't. The FBI does not have the authority to investigate an alleged State criminal act. If she really wanted the facts to be found out she would have asked the state criminal justice system to investigate sometime in the past 36 years. She is a radical at U of Cal and is willing to do or say anything to push an agenda. SHE DOES NOT WANT AN OPEN INVESTIGATION. Just like she does not want to testify in front of the committee without protection from being charged with perjury.

This isn't a background check which the FBI has done on almost every appointed. It would be a criminal investigation and the FBI does not have the authority to investigate an alleged state crime.

As we have seen already this FBI cannot be trusted to investigate a jay walking incident.


Lol. Why are you so opposed to finding out the truth? What's the hurry with this nomination? You clowns have already proven that you are willing to let SCOTUS seats sit vacant for years. You bypassed a legitimate nomination with some fabricated BS and even changed the rules with number of votes needed for confirmation. But now you want to rush a vote without properly confirming/refuting the authenticity of allegations. What you are seeing now is the backlash from the Garland nomination. We were at one time all Americans, but we have now been divided into tribes. Just look at how pathetic you have become, as a "Christian Conservative" who supports the antics of a man like Trump. You guys are so broken.


As too are you Sir........both sides are broken in some form or another. I know Democrats don't like to look at history, because it exposes their radical form of thinking. But, all you have to do is look at the Democrat behavior in 1992 and 2003. In 1992 the "Biden rule" came about.....he went to the floor of the Senate stated that the President should not nominate a Justice in an election year. Then, in 2016 the Democrats went against there on thought process and nominated Mr. Garland.....the Republicans simply followed the "Biden Rule". Additionally, 1992 and 2016 were Presidential Election years, not mid-terms as we are currently in.....there is a big difference. 2003 shows how sneaky the Democrats are as they pulled out all the stops to ruin Miguel Estrada......which they ultimately did. Dispute it if you will, but these are the facts......and it is sad to say the least.


The Biden rule is the weakest excuse for refusing to take up the Garland nomination. First of all, Garland was nominated way before the summer started. Second, when has the GOP ever listened to Biden. Third, Biden said till after the election. The election was on Nov. 8th, yet we still did not move with hearings. And fourth, if a SCOTUS seat were to open during Feb of 2020. do you think the GOP will want to observe the Biden rule, or will they push for a nomination?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Keith Stone



Joined: 24 Dec 2010
Posts: 107

PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 9:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

PV=nRT wrote:
Keith Stone wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Excavator wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
Still waiting on Midge to tell us how many days the GOP was willing to let Scalia's seat stay open.


Do not answer apples and oranges questions. To do so would legitimize your illegitimate argument.


The GOP proved they are willing to wait a REALLY long time for a SCOTUS judge confirmation in the name of "Politics". That seat would still be vacant had Hillary won the election. Now, the GOP is trying to rush an appointment in the name of "politics". LOL You clowns are beyond predictable.


The GOP Has not rushed. The confirmation process has run it's intended course. Politics is always the leading factor, but the fact is that Judge kavanaugh is more than qualified to fill the seat. The last minute hail Mary with the fake plant will fail, and kavanaugh will be confirmed.


But you really have to laugh about things. Woman says he attacked me and shouldn't be on bench. Yet when given opportunity to go before the committees and testify about what happened she continues to hee and haw and ask for this situation or that situation before she will testify.

Not only does she want to pick the day she testifies, but who asks her questions and the scheduled of the day for all the proceedings and who else will testify that day. If this was a legitimate witness she would t4estify when the committee wanted and she would answer all questions from all committee members.

Committee should tell her here is the date you will testify and you will be face questions from every member of committee who wants to ask you a question. If not then we will continue without your input.


She is asking for a legitimate investigation, which is what should be done to find the facts in this case. These Senate committee's are a joke, as both sides have already made up their minds minus any facts. Is there any reason why you are opposed to a legitimate investigation?


No she isn't. The FBI does not have the authority to investigate an alleged State criminal act. If she really wanted the facts to be found out she would have asked the state criminal justice system to investigate sometime in the past 36 years. She is a radical at U of Cal and is willing to do or say anything to push an agenda. SHE DOES NOT WANT AN OPEN INVESTIGATION. Just like she does not want to testify in front of the committee without protection from being charged with perjury.

This isn't a background check which the FBI has done on almost every appointed. It would be a criminal investigation and the FBI does not have the authority to investigate an alleged state crime.

As we have seen already this FBI cannot be trusted to investigate a jay walking incident.


Lol. Why are you so opposed to finding out the truth? What's the hurry with this nomination? You clowns have already proven that you are willing to let SCOTUS seats sit vacant for years. You bypassed a legitimate nomination with some fabricated BS and even changed the rules with number of votes needed for confirmation. But now you want to rush a vote without properly confirming/refuting the authenticity of allegations. What you are seeing now is the backlash from the Garland nomination. We were at one time all Americans, but we have now been divided into tribes. Just look at how pathetic you have become, as a "Christian Conservative" who supports the antics of a man like Trump. You guys are so broken.


As too are you Sir........both sides are broken in some form or another. I know Democrats don't like to look at history, because it exposes their radical form of thinking. But, all you have to do is look at the Democrat behavior in 1992 and 2003. In 1992 the "Biden rule" came about.....he went to the floor of the Senate stated that the President should not nominate a Justice in an election year. Then, in 2016 the Democrats went against there on thought process and nominated Mr. Garland.....the Republicans simply followed the "Biden Rule". Additionally, 1992 and 2016 were Presidential Election years, not mid-terms as we are currently in.....there is a big difference. 2003 shows how sneaky the Democrats are as they pulled out all the stops to ruin Miguel Estrada......which they ultimately did. Dispute it if you will, but these are the facts......and it is sad to say the least.


The Biden rule is the weakest excuse for refusing to take up the Garland nomination. First of all, Garland was nominated way before the summer started. Second, when has the GOP ever listened to Biden. Third, Biden said till after the election. The election was on Nov. 8th, yet we still did not move with hearings. And fourth, if a SCOTUS seat were to open during Feb of 2020. do you think the GOP will want to observe the Biden rule, or will they push for a nomination?


Hold up swolled up.....no need to get angry, the truth hurts sometimes. All I'm simply saying is the Democrat leadership runs around like they are Little Bo Peep and do nothing wrong, when in reality they are some the sleaziest and down right conniving politicians around.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Excavator



Joined: 22 May 2012
Posts: 3169
Location: Benton, Arkansas

PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 9:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Excavator wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
Still waiting on Midge to tell us how many days the GOP was willing to let Scalia's seat stay open.


Do not answer apples and oranges questions. To do so would legitimize your illegitimate argument.


The GOP proved they are willing to wait a REALLY long time for a SCOTUS judge confirmation in the name of "Politics". That seat would still be vacant had Hillary won the election. Now, the GOP is trying to rush an appointment in the name of "politics". LOL You clowns are beyond predictable.


The GOP Has not rushed. The confirmation process has run it's intended course. Politics is always the leading factor, but the fact is that Judge kavanaugh is more than qualified to fill the seat. The last minute hail Mary with the fake plant will fail, and kavanaugh will be confirmed.


But you really have to laugh about things. Woman says he attacked me and shouldn't be on bench. Yet when given opportunity to go before the committees and testify about what happened she continues to hee and haw and ask for this situation or that situation before she will testify.

Not only does she want to pick the day she testifies, but who asks her questions and the scheduled of the day for all the proceedings and who else will testify that day. If this was a legitimate witness she would t4estify when the committee wanted and she would answer all questions from all committee members.

Committee should tell her here is the date you will testify and you will be face questions from every member of committee who wants to ask you a question. If not then we will continue without your input.


She is asking for a legitimate investigation, which is what should be done to find the facts in this case. These Senate committee's are a joke, as both sides have already made up their minds minus any facts. Is there any reason why you are opposed to a legitimate investigation?


No she isn't. The FBI does not have the authority to investigate an alleged State criminal act. If she really wanted the facts to be found out she would have asked the state criminal justice system to investigate sometime in the past 36 years. She is a radical at U of Cal and is willing to do or say anything to push an agenda. SHE DOES NOT WANT AN OPEN INVESTIGATION. Just like she does not want to testify in front of the committee without protection from being charged with perjury.

This isn't a background check which the FBI has done on almost every appointed. It would be a criminal investigation and the FBI does not have the authority to investigate an alleged state crime.

As we have seen already this FBI cannot be trusted to investigate a jay walking incident.


Why are you so opposed to finding out the truth?


We already know the truth. This is just another fake-a$$ plot by sleaze-bag, desperate democrats, and you know it without a doubt. You're all over this, but not a peep about Keith Ellison. 911 calls, an actual police report, some REAL evidence in Ellison's case, but that's okay, and he gets a pass because he's a liberal democrat, right?

What about Keith Ellison?
_________________
IN GOD WE TRUST!
All others must sign an affidavit...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NeverTrustAMidget



Joined: 06 Oct 2007
Posts: 13498

PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Excavator wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
Still waiting on Midge to tell us how many days the GOP was willing to let Scalia's seat stay open.


Do not answer apples and oranges questions. To do so would legitimize your illegitimate argument.


The GOP proved they are willing to wait a REALLY long time for a SCOTUS judge confirmation in the name of "Politics". That seat would still be vacant had Hillary won the election. Now, the GOP is trying to rush an appointment in the name of "politics". LOL You clowns are beyond predictable.


The GOP Has not rushed. The confirmation process has run it's intended course. Politics is always the leading factor, but the fact is that Judge kavanaugh is more than qualified to fill the seat. The last minute hail Mary with the fake plant will fail, and kavanaugh will be confirmed.


But you really have to laugh about things. Woman says he attacked me and shouldn't be on bench. Yet when given opportunity to go before the committees and testify about what happened she continues to hee and haw and ask for this situation or that situation before she will testify.

Not only does she want to pick the day she testifies, but who asks her questions and the scheduled of the day for all the proceedings and who else will testify that day. If this was a legitimate witness she would t4estify when the committee wanted and she would answer all questions from all committee members.

Committee should tell her here is the date you will testify and you will be face questions from every member of committee who wants to ask you a question. If not then we will continue without your input.


She is asking for a legitimate investigation, which is what should be done to find the facts in this case. These Senate committee's are a joke, as both sides have already made up their minds minus any facts. Is there any reason why you are opposed to a legitimate investigation?


No she isn't. The FBI does not have the authority to investigate an alleged State criminal act. If she really wanted the facts to be found out she would have asked the state criminal justice system to investigate sometime in the past 36 years. She is a radical at U of Cal and is willing to do or say anything to push an agenda. SHE DOES NOT WANT AN OPEN INVESTIGATION. Just like she does not want to testify in front of the committee without protection from being charged with perjury.

This isn't a background check which the FBI has done on almost every appointed. It would be a criminal investigation and the FBI does not have the authority to investigate an alleged state crime.

As we have seen already this FBI cannot be trusted to investigate a jay walking incident.


Lol. Why are you so opposed to finding out the truth? What's the hurry with this nomination? You clowns have already proven that you are willing to let SCOTUS seats sit vacant for years. You bypassed a legitimate nomination with some fabricated BS and even changed the rules with number of votes needed for confirmation. But now you want to rush a vote without properly confirming/refuting the authenticity of allegations. What you are seeing now is the backlash from the Garland nomination. We were at one time all Americans, but we have now been divided into tribes. Just look at how pathetic you have become, as a "Christian Conservative" who supports the antics of a man like Trump. You guys are so broken.



How does demanding an investigation by an organization which cannot LEGALLY investigate the incident get to the truth?

This isn't about getting top the truth. The left knows the FBI CANNOT investigate an alleged state crime but they still insist that everything is delayed until the FBI investigates. If they were interested in getting to the truth they would have the state investigating things.

This is 100% about delaying and possibly killing the nomination of Kavanaugh. Has nothing to do with getting to the truth.
_________________
,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NeverTrustAMidget



Joined: 06 Oct 2007
Posts: 13498

PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You could stop all this tomorrow.

Just pass a law which makes it a felony to knowingly make a false claim about another person. Or to assist in spreading what is knowingly a false claim about a person.

Right now there is no form of punishment for making false claims about someone. You have civil action to take but most elected/appointed officials do not have the time and money it takes to go through the slander/libel process.

Make it a criminal act and the elected/appointed official does not have to be on front lines of the case. Leaving them time to do the job they were elected/appointed to do.
_________________
,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    midsouthracing.com Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group