midsouthracing.com Forum Index
Comp Cams
TCI
Dirty Girl Racewear Dirt Heads Crowley's Ridge Raceway
I-30 New Vision Your Ad
Your Ad George Kell Sign Co. Smileys Racing Products

 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in  Subscribe 
 

And Yet ANOTHER win for santiy
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    midsouthracing.com Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
tilley88



Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Posts: 3244

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 7:32 pm    Post subject: Re: And Yet ANOTHER win for santiy Reply with quote

PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
mudslinger47 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
mudslinger47 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
JamieHall wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Basically telling the activist judges that tried to block the ban based solely on political activism to go screw themselves.


So are we back to calling every judge we disagree with an "activist" judge?


They ruled on personal beliefs not the law, one even had a family member who was effected by the ban. So yes he was an activist judge. Obama did the exact same thing and these judges had no problem with it.





When you get a chance, can you explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban. Maybe you can provide a list of domestic terrorist attacks committed by Iranian nationals to Saudi nationals. All in the name of "sanity" of course.


Doesn't make any difference whether you like it or not or who you'd have chosen or not, the fact that the SCOTUS OK'd it is the important part... If the President feels as though he needs to revisit and add more to it, he'll be able to with out any objection.... why do you care? You were against the ban anyway... any port in the storm huh....loser


In other words, you don't have a clue and lack any kind of rational explanation. But then again, you're a trumpkin. Typical. Lol


My apologies, I didn't realize your an idiot and cant read and comprehend..



Paging Ex and Tilley. Your boys need some help. Midge is hiding and Duane is not helping your cause one bit. Explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban, but a bunch of countries who have not carried out terrorist attacks on our soil are. How does this make sense in the name of "sanity" and national security?


Are only Muslim countries singled out?


Why is Saudi Arabia not on this travel ban? You are familiar with 9/11, are you not?


Do they harbor ISIS? Are they the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism? Are they included in the Axis of terror? Are they run by a communist dictator?


Absolutely. Wahhabism was founded by the House of Saud, which still rules Saudi Arabia today. This sect of Islam is by far the biggest player when it comes to global terrorism. Al Qaeda, Isis, and Boka Haram are all modern Wahhabists. So I ask you again, why is Saudi Arabia not part of this travel ban?


Has Saudi ever been recognized bu the US as a state sponsor of terrorism? Do you believe they’re not on the travel ban list because your liberal news outlets claim he has shady business dealings with them? Do you think they should be on the list because of 911?
_________________
When liberal heads explode, there's not much of a mess to clean up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tilley88



Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Posts: 3244

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 7:33 pm    Post subject: Re: And Yet ANOTHER win for santiy Reply with quote

PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
mudslinger47 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
mudslinger47 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
JamieHall wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Basically telling the activist judges that tried to block the ban based solely on political activism to go screw themselves.


So are we back to calling every judge we disagree with an "activist" judge?


They ruled on personal beliefs not the law, one even had a family member who was effected by the ban. So yes he was an activist judge. Obama did the exact same thing and these judges had no problem with it.





When you get a chance, can you explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban. Maybe you can provide a list of domestic terrorist attacks committed by Iranian nationals to Saudi nationals. All in the name of "sanity" of course.


Doesn't make any difference whether you like it or not or who you'd have chosen or not, the fact that the SCOTUS OK'd it is the important part... If the President feels as though he needs to revisit and add more to it, he'll be able to with out any objection.... why do you care? You were against the ban anyway... any port in the storm huh....loser


In other words, you don't have a clue and lack any kind of rational explanation. But then again, you're a trumpkin. Typical. Lol


My apologies, I didn't realize your an idiot and cant read and comprehend..



Paging Ex and Tilley. Your boys need some help. Midge is hiding and Duane is not helping your cause one bit. Explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban, but a bunch of countries who have not carried out terrorist attacks on our soil are. How does this make sense in the name of "sanity" and national security?


Are only Muslim countries singled out?


Why is Saudi Arabia not on this travel ban? You are familiar with 9/11, are you not?


Do they harbor ISIS? Are they the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism? Are they included in the Axis of terror? Are they run by a communist dictator?


Absolutely. Wahhabism was founded by the House of Saud, which still rules Saudi Arabia today. This sect of Islam is by far the biggest player when it comes to global terrorism. Al Qaeda, Isis, and Boka Haram are all modern Wahhabists. So I ask you again, why is Saudi Arabia not part of this travel ban?


Has Saudi ever been recognized bu the US as a state sponsor of terrorism? Do you believe they’re not on the travel ban list because your liberal news outlets claim he has shady business dealings with them? Do you think they should be on the list because of 911?
_________________
When liberal heads explode, there's not much of a mess to clean up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PV=nRT



Joined: 14 Jun 2012
Posts: 3548

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 7:42 pm    Post subject: Re: And Yet ANOTHER win for santiy Reply with quote

tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
mudslinger47 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
mudslinger47 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
JamieHall wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Basically telling the activist judges that tried to block the ban based solely on political activism to go screw themselves.


So are we back to calling every judge we disagree with an "activist" judge?


They ruled on personal beliefs not the law, one even had a family member who was effected by the ban. So yes he was an activist judge. Obama did the exact same thing and these judges had no problem with it.





When you get a chance, can you explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban. Maybe you can provide a list of domestic terrorist attacks committed by Iranian nationals to Saudi nationals. All in the name of "sanity" of course.


Doesn't make any difference whether you like it or not or who you'd have chosen or not, the fact that the SCOTUS OK'd it is the important part... If the President feels as though he needs to revisit and add more to it, he'll be able to with out any objection.... why do you care? You were against the ban anyway... any port in the storm huh....loser


In other words, you don't have a clue and lack any kind of rational explanation. But then again, you're a trumpkin. Typical. Lol


My apologies, I didn't realize your an idiot and cant read and comprehend..



Paging Ex and Tilley. Your boys need some help. Midge is hiding and Duane is not helping your cause one bit. Explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban, but a bunch of countries who have not carried out terrorist attacks on our soil are. How does this make sense in the name of "sanity" and national security?


Are only Muslim countries singled out?


Why is Saudi Arabia not on this travel ban? You are familiar with 9/11, are you not?


Do they harbor ISIS? Are they the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism? Are they included in the Axis of terror? Are they run by a communist dictator?


Absolutely. Wahhabism was founded by the House of Saud, which still rules Saudi Arabia today. This sect of Islam is by far the biggest player when it comes to global terrorism. Al Qaeda, Isis, and Boka Haram are all modern Wahhabists. So I ask you again, why is Saudi Arabia not part of this travel ban?


Has Saudi ever been recognized bu the US as a state sponsor of terrorism? Do you believe they’re not on the travel ban list because your liberal news outlets claim he has shady business dealings with them? Do you think they should be on the list because of 911?


You're tap dancing. I've already explained to you that most Islamic terror attacks are done by Wahhabists. This sect of Islam comes from Saudi Arabia. Al Qaeda, Isis, and Boka Haram are all wahhabists. Why do you think 15 of the 19 hijackers were from SA? Where was Osama Bin Laden from? A rather substantial part of the Saudi population still believes in this extreme form of Islam which is known for global terror. So again, why is Saudi Arabia not on the travel ban????? This should be a no brainer. On the flip side, how many American's have been killed by Iranians?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tilley88



Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Posts: 3244

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 8:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Most Islamist militants have nothing to do with Saudi Wahhabism. Your liberal indoctrination is showing.......
_________________
When liberal heads explode, there's not much of a mess to clean up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tilley88



Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Posts: 3244

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 8:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Most Islamist militants have nothing to do with Saudi Wahhabism. Your liberal indoctrination is showing.......
_________________
When liberal heads explode, there's not much of a mess to clean up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mudslinger47



Joined: 27 Apr 2010
Posts: 10591
Location: Central Coast of Ca

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 8:47 pm    Post subject: Re: And Yet ANOTHER win for santiy Reply with quote

PV=nRT wrote:
I've already explained to you ?


I read that , I haven't laughed so hard in months.... still snickering... you "explained"... man that was a good one... got any more?
_________________
Schmit Samiches for all the libs!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PV=nRT



Joined: 14 Jun 2012
Posts: 3548

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 9:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tilley88 wrote:
Most Islamist militants have nothing to do with Saudi Wahhabism. Your liberal indoctrination is showing.......


Is this your explanation as to why Saudi Arabia is not on the travel ban? Lol
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tilley88



Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Posts: 3244

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 9:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
Most Islamist militants have nothing to do with Saudi Wahhabism. Your liberal indoctrination is showing.......


Is this your explanation as to why Saudi Arabia is not on the travel ban? Lol


What has the UN done to stop Saudi Wahhabi sponsored terrorism? What did Obama and HRC do to stop it?
_________________
When liberal heads explode, there's not much of a mess to clean up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PV=nRT



Joined: 14 Jun 2012
Posts: 3548

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 9:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
Most Islamist militants have nothing to do with Saudi Wahhabism. Your liberal indoctrination is showing.......


Is this your explanation as to why Saudi Arabia is not on the travel ban? Lol


What has the UN done to stop Saudi Wahhabi sponsored terrorism? What did Obama and HRC do to stop it?


WTF are you talking about? The question is why is SA not part of the travel ban? That country is infested with a brand of Islam that has killed thousands of Americans. But hey, keep tap dancing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tilley88



Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Posts: 3244

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 9:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
Most Islamist militants have nothing to do with Saudi Wahhabism. Your liberal indoctrination is showing.......


Is this your explanation as to why Saudi Arabia is not on the travel ban? Lol


What has the UN done to stop Saudi Wahhabi sponsored terrorism? What did Obama and HRC do to stop it?


WTF are you talking about? The question is why is SA not part of the travel ban? That country is infested with a brand of Islam that has killed thousands of Americans. But hey, keep tap dancing.



Are you saying all Muslims who practice Wahhabism are terrorists?
_________________
When liberal heads explode, there's not much of a mess to clean up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PV=nRT



Joined: 14 Jun 2012
Posts: 3548

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 9:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
Most Islamist militants have nothing to do with Saudi Wahhabism. Your liberal indoctrination is showing.......


Is this your explanation as to why Saudi Arabia is not on the travel ban? Lol


What has the UN done to stop Saudi Wahhabi sponsored terrorism? What did Obama and HRC do to stop it?


WTF are you talking about? The question is why is SA not part of the travel ban? That country is infested with a brand of Islam that has killed thousands of Americans. But hey, keep tap dancing.



Are you saying all Muslims who practice Wahhabism are terrorists?


Al Qaeda
ISIS
BOKA Haram
9/11 hijackers

You disagree?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tilley88



Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Posts: 3244

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 10:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
Most Islamist militants have nothing to do with Saudi Wahhabism. Your liberal indoctrination is showing.......


Is this your explanation as to why Saudi Arabia is not on the travel ban? Lol


What has the UN done to stop Saudi Wahhabi sponsored terrorism? What did Obama and HRC do to stop it?


WTF are you talking about? The question is why is SA not part of the travel ban? That country is infested with a brand of Islam that has killed thousands of Americans. But hey, keep tap dancing.



Are you saying all Muslims who practice Wahhabism are terrorists?


Al Qaeda
ISIS
BOKA Haram
9/11 hijackers

You disagree?


What percentage of those practicing Wahhabism worldwide make up these groups? I don’t disagree that the majority of terrorist organizations practice a very radical form of Wahhabism, but they’re in the minority compared to the overall population who do practice it. The KSA have taken steps over the last few years to purge these folks from their ranks. They also have missionaries all over the world teaching a much more peaceful form of Wahhabism. Was the Saudi government involved in 911? Many say they were genuinely shocked by that act of terror and the fallout that followed soon after. If the Saudi government was involved in 911, why did we never go after them? It’s been almost 17 years since it happened, yet 3 presidents and the UN have yet to call the Saudi government to the carpet for it. Should we go after the auto manufacturers or the liquor stores for the drunk drivers who kill innocent people? I’m all for putting SA on the ban list if we can prove they were involved in 911.
_________________
When liberal heads explode, there's not much of a mess to clean up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PV=nRT



Joined: 14 Jun 2012
Posts: 3548

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 10:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
Most Islamist militants have nothing to do with Saudi Wahhabism. Your liberal indoctrination is showing.......


Is this your explanation as to why Saudi Arabia is not on the travel ban? Lol


What has the UN done to stop Saudi Wahhabi sponsored terrorism? What did Obama and HRC do to stop it?


WTF are you talking about? The question is why is SA not part of the travel ban? That country is infested with a brand of Islam that has killed thousands of Americans. But hey, keep tap dancing.



Are you saying all Muslims who practice Wahhabism are terrorists?


Al Qaeda
ISIS
BOKA Haram
9/11 hijackers

You disagree?


What percentage of those practicing Wahhabism worldwide make up these groups? I don’t disagree that the majority of terrorist organizations practice a very radical form of Wahhabism, but they’re in the minority compared to the overall population who do practice it. The KSA have taken steps over the last few years to purge these folks from their ranks. They also have missionaries all over the world teaching a much more peaceful form of Wahhabism. Was the Saudi government involved in 911? Many say they were genuinely shocked by that act of terror and the fallout that followed soon after. If the Saudi government was involved in 911, why did we never go after them? It’s been almost 17 years since it happened, yet 3 presidents and the UN have yet to call the Saudi government to the carpet for it. Should we go after the auto manufacturers or the liquor stores for the drunk drivers who kill innocent people? I’m all for putting SA on the ban list if we can prove they were involved in 911.


Again, Wahabbism is responsible for the deaths of thousands of Americans. It's roots are deeply seeded from Saudi Arabia. Despite the Saudi Monarchy (who talk out both sides of their mouths), there is a significant portion of the Saudi population who follows this extreme form of Islam. So if we are protecting Americans, why is SA not on the list?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mudslinger47



Joined: 27 Apr 2010
Posts: 10591
Location: Central Coast of Ca

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 10:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
Most Islamist militants have nothing to do with Saudi Wahhabism. Your liberal indoctrination is showing.......


Is this your explanation as to why Saudi Arabia is not on the travel ban? Lol


What has the UN done to stop Saudi Wahhabi sponsored terrorism? What did Obama and HRC do to stop it?


WTF are you talking about? The question is why is SA not part of the travel ban? That country is infested with a brand of Islam that has killed thousands of Americans. But hey, keep tap dancing.



Are you saying all Muslims who practice Wahhabism are terrorists?


Al Qaeda
ISIS
BOKA Haram
9/11 hijackers

You disagree?


What percentage of those practicing Wahhabism worldwide make up these groups? I don’t disagree that the majority of terrorist organizations practice a very radical form of Wahhabism, but they’re in the minority compared to the overall population who do practice it. The KSA have taken steps over the last few years to purge these folks from their ranks. They also have missionaries all over the world teaching a much more peaceful form of Wahhabism. Was the Saudi government involved in 911? Many say they were genuinely shocked by that act of terror and the fallout that followed soon after. If the Saudi government was involved in 911, why did we never go after them? It’s been almost 17 years since it happened, yet 3 presidents and the UN have yet to call the Saudi government to the carpet for it. Should we go after the auto manufacturers or the liquor stores for the drunk drivers who kill innocent people? I’m all for putting SA on the ban list if we can prove they were involved in 911.


Again, Wahabbism is responsible for the deaths of thousands of Americans. It's roots are deeply seeded from Saudi Arabia. Despite the Saudi Monarchy (who talk out both sides of their mouths), there is a significant portion of the Saudi population who follows this extreme form of Islam. So if we are protecting Americans, why is SA not on the list?


Maybe it will be in the near future, now that the court has opened the way... or maybe the President has another pressure point that would work better.... I don't know and neither do you, but what the President did with NK so far is aces.... whether you like it or not... Trump said the other day, "Its important that nations get along." Makes sense to me... Doesn't it strike you odd that President Trump can work a deal with North Korea but the democrats will fight him tooth and nail regardless of what he does? I would point out Trump following a law Bill Clinton and "W" had their finger prints all over... Are you big enough to admit that?
_________________
Schmit Samiches for all the libs!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tilley88



Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Posts: 3244

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 10:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
Most Islamist militants have nothing to do with Saudi Wahhabism. Your liberal indoctrination is showing.......


Is this your explanation as to why Saudi Arabia is not on the travel ban? Lol


What has the UN done to stop Saudi Wahhabi sponsored terrorism? What did Obama and HRC do to stop it?


WTF are you talking about? The question is why is SA not part of the travel ban? That country is infested with a brand of Islam that has killed thousands of Americans. But hey, keep tap dancing.



Are you saying all Muslims who practice Wahhabism are terrorists?


Al Qaeda
ISIS
BOKA Haram
9/11 hijackers

You disagree?


What percentage of those practicing Wahhabism worldwide make up these groups? I don’t disagree that the majority of terrorist organizations practice a very radical form of Wahhabism, but they’re in the minority compared to the overall population who do practice it. The KSA have taken steps over the last few years to purge these folks from their ranks. They also have missionaries all over the world teaching a much more peaceful form of Wahhabism. Was the Saudi government involved in 911? Many say they were genuinely shocked by that act of terror and the fallout that followed soon after. If the Saudi government was involved in 911, why did we never go after them? It’s been almost 17 years since it happened, yet 3 presidents and the UN have yet to call the Saudi government to the carpet for it. Should we go after the auto manufacturers or the liquor stores for the drunk drivers who kill innocent people? I’m all for putting SA on the ban list if we can prove they were involved in 911.


Again, Wahabbism is responsible for the deaths of thousands of Americans. It's roots are deeply seeded from Saudi Arabia. Despite the Saudi Monarchy (who talk out both sides of their mouths), there is a significant portion of the Saudi population who follows this extreme form of Islam. So if we are protecting Americans, why is SA not on the list?


Significant portion? What percentage of those practicing Saudi Wahhabism are terrorists? Now who’s tap dancing?
_________________
When liberal heads explode, there's not much of a mess to clean up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    midsouthracing.com Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group