midsouthracing.com Forum Index
Comp Cams
TCI
Dirty Girl Racewear Dirt Heads Crowley's Ridge Raceway
I-30 New Vision Your Ad
Your Ad George Kell Sign Co. Smileys Racing Products

 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in  Subscribe 
 

And Yet ANOTHER win for santiy
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    midsouthracing.com Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
NeverTrustAMidget



Joined: 06 Oct 2007
Posts: 13588

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 3:24 am    Post subject: And Yet ANOTHER win for santiy Reply with quote

SCOTUS upheld Trump travel ban. Basically telling the activist judges that tried to block the ban based solely on political activism to go screw themselves.
_________________
,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PV=nRT



Joined: 14 Jun 2012
Posts: 3921

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 7:11 am    Post subject: Re: And Yet ANOTHER win for santiy Reply with quote

NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
SCOTUS upheld Trump travel ban. Basically telling the activist judges that tried to block the ban based solely on political activism to go screw themselves.


When you get a chance, can you explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban. Maybe you can provide a list of domestic terrorist attacks committed by Iranian nationals to Saudi nationals. All in the name of "sanity" of course.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JamieHall



Joined: 11 Dec 2005
Posts: 4468
Location: Nashville, TN

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 7:47 am    Post subject: Re: And Yet ANOTHER win for santiy Reply with quote

NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Basically telling the activist judges that tried to block the ban based solely on political activism to go screw themselves.


So are we back to calling every judge we disagree with an "activist" judge?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
NeverTrustAMidget



Joined: 06 Oct 2007
Posts: 13588

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 11:05 am    Post subject: Re: And Yet ANOTHER win for santiy Reply with quote

JamieHall wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Basically telling the activist judges that tried to block the ban based solely on political activism to go screw themselves.


So are we back to calling every judge we disagree with an "activist" judge?


They ruled on personal beliefs not the law, one even had a family member who was effected by the ban. So yes he was an activist judge. Obama did the exact same thing and these judges had no problem with it.
_________________
,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PV=nRT



Joined: 14 Jun 2012
Posts: 3921

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 11:36 am    Post subject: Re: And Yet ANOTHER win for santiy Reply with quote

NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
JamieHall wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Basically telling the activist judges that tried to block the ban based solely on political activism to go screw themselves.


So are we back to calling every judge we disagree with an "activist" judge?


They ruled on personal beliefs not the law, one even had a family member who was effected by the ban. So yes he was an activist judge. Obama did the exact same thing and these judges had no problem with it.




When you get a chance, can you explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban. Maybe you can provide a list of domestic terrorist attacks committed by Iranian nationals to Saudi nationals. All in the name of "sanity" of course.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mudslinger47



Joined: 27 Apr 2010
Posts: 10604
Location: Central Coast of Ca

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 3:10 pm    Post subject: Re: And Yet ANOTHER win for santiy Reply with quote

PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
JamieHall wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Basically telling the activist judges that tried to block the ban based solely on political activism to go screw themselves.


So are we back to calling every judge we disagree with an "activist" judge?


They ruled on personal beliefs not the law, one even had a family member who was effected by the ban. So yes he was an activist judge. Obama did the exact same thing and these judges had no problem with it.




When you get a chance, can you explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban. Maybe you can provide a list of domestic terrorist attacks committed by Iranian nationals to Saudi nationals. All in the name of "sanity" of course.


Doesn't make any difference whether you like it or not or who you'd have chosen or not, the fact that the SCOTUS OK'd it is the important part... If the President feels as though he needs to revisit and add more to it, he'll be able to with out any objection.... why do you care? You were against the ban anyway... any port in the storm huh....loser
_________________
Schmit Samiches for all the libs!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PV=nRT



Joined: 14 Jun 2012
Posts: 3921

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 3:46 pm    Post subject: Re: And Yet ANOTHER win for santiy Reply with quote

mudslinger47 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
JamieHall wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Basically telling the activist judges that tried to block the ban based solely on political activism to go screw themselves.


So are we back to calling every judge we disagree with an "activist" judge?


They ruled on personal beliefs not the law, one even had a family member who was effected by the ban. So yes he was an activist judge. Obama did the exact same thing and these judges had no problem with it.




When you get a chance, can you explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban. Maybe you can provide a list of domestic terrorist attacks committed by Iranian nationals to Saudi nationals. All in the name of "sanity" of course.


Doesn't make any difference whether you like it or not or who you'd have chosen or not, the fact that the SCOTUS OK'd it is the important part... If the President feels as though he needs to revisit and add more to it, he'll be able to with out any objection.... why do you care? You were against the ban anyway... any port in the storm huh....loser


In other words, you don't have a clue and lack any kind of rational explanation. But then again, you're a trumpkin. Typical. Lol
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mudslinger47



Joined: 27 Apr 2010
Posts: 10604
Location: Central Coast of Ca

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 4:05 pm    Post subject: Re: And Yet ANOTHER win for santiy Reply with quote

PV=nRT wrote:
mudslinger47 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
JamieHall wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Basically telling the activist judges that tried to block the ban based solely on political activism to go screw themselves.


So are we back to calling every judge we disagree with an "activist" judge?


They ruled on personal beliefs not the law, one even had a family member who was effected by the ban. So yes he was an activist judge. Obama did the exact same thing and these judges had no problem with it.




When you get a chance, can you explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban. Maybe you can provide a list of domestic terrorist attacks committed by Iranian nationals to Saudi nationals. All in the name of "sanity" of course.


Doesn't make any difference whether you like it or not or who you'd have chosen or not, the fact that the SCOTUS OK'd it is the important part... If the President feels as though he needs to revisit and add more to it, he'll be able to with out any objection.... why do you care? You were against the ban anyway... any port in the storm huh....loser


In other words, you don't have a clue and lack any kind of rational explanation. But then again, you're a trumpkin. Typical. Lol


My apologies, I didn't realize your an idiot and cant read and comprehend..
_________________
Schmit Samiches for all the libs!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PV=nRT



Joined: 14 Jun 2012
Posts: 3921

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 5:44 pm    Post subject: Re: And Yet ANOTHER win for santiy Reply with quote

mudslinger47 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
mudslinger47 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
JamieHall wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Basically telling the activist judges that tried to block the ban based solely on political activism to go screw themselves.


So are we back to calling every judge we disagree with an "activist" judge?


They ruled on personal beliefs not the law, one even had a family member who was effected by the ban. So yes he was an activist judge. Obama did the exact same thing and these judges had no problem with it.




When you get a chance, can you explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban. Maybe you can provide a list of domestic terrorist attacks committed by Iranian nationals to Saudi nationals. All in the name of "sanity" of course.


Doesn't make any difference whether you like it or not or who you'd have chosen or not, the fact that the SCOTUS OK'd it is the important part... If the President feels as though he needs to revisit and add more to it, he'll be able to with out any objection.... why do you care? You were against the ban anyway... any port in the storm huh....loser


In other words, you don't have a clue and lack any kind of rational explanation. But then again, you're a trumpkin. Typical. Lol


My apologies, I didn't realize your an idiot and cant read and comprehend..



Paging Ex and Tilley. Your boys need some help. Midge is hiding and Duane is not helping your cause one bit. Explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban, but a bunch of countries who have not carried out terrorist attacks on our soil are. How does this make sense in the name of "sanity" and national security?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tilley88



Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Posts: 3481

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 6:40 pm    Post subject: Re: And Yet ANOTHER win for santiy Reply with quote

PV=nRT wrote:
mudslinger47 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
mudslinger47 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
JamieHall wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Basically telling the activist judges that tried to block the ban based solely on political activism to go screw themselves.


So are we back to calling every judge we disagree with an "activist" judge?


They ruled on personal beliefs not the law, one even had a family member who was effected by the ban. So yes he was an activist judge. Obama did the exact same thing and these judges had no problem with it.





When you get a chance, can you explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban. Maybe you can provide a list of domestic terrorist attacks committed by Iranian nationals to Saudi nationals. All in the name of "sanity" of course.


Doesn't make any difference whether you like it or not or who you'd have chosen or not, the fact that the SCOTUS OK'd it is the important part... If the President feels as though he needs to revisit and add more to it, he'll be able to with out any objection.... why do you care? You were against the ban anyway... any port in the storm huh....loser


In other words, you don't have a clue and lack any kind of rational explanation. But then again, you're a trumpkin. Typical. Lol


My apologies, I didn't realize your an idiot and cant read and comprehend..



Paging Ex and Tilley. Your boys need some help. Midge is hiding and Duane is not helping your cause one bit. Explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban, but a bunch of countries who have not carried out terrorist attacks on our soil are. How does this make sense in the name of "sanity" and national security?


Are only Muslim countries singled out?
_________________
When liberal heads explode, there's not much of a mess to clean up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tilley88



Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Posts: 3481

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 6:42 pm    Post subject: Re: And Yet ANOTHER win for santiy Reply with quote

PV=nRT wrote:
mudslinger47 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
mudslinger47 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
JamieHall wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Basically telling the activist judges that tried to block the ban based solely on political activism to go screw themselves.


So are we back to calling every judge we disagree with an "activist" judge?


They ruled on personal beliefs not the law, one even had a family member who was effected by the ban. So yes he was an activist judge. Obama did the exact same thing and these judges had no problem with it.


What countries are in this version of the travel ban? Is it only Muslim countries?


When you get a chance, can you explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban. Maybe you can provide a list of domestic terrorist attacks committed by Iranian nationals to Saudi nationals. All in the name of "sanity" of course.


Doesn't make any difference whether you like it or not or who you'd have chosen or not, the fact that the SCOTUS OK'd it is the important part... If the President feels as though he needs to revisit and add more to it, he'll be able to with out any objection.... why do you care? You were against the ban anyway... any port in the storm huh....loser


In other words, you don't have a clue and lack any kind of rational explanation. But then again, you're a trumpkin. Typical. Lol


My apologies, I didn't realize your an idiot and cant read and comprehend..



Paging Ex and Tilley. Your boys need some help. Midge is hiding and Duane is not helping your cause one bit. Explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban, but a bunch of countries who have not carried out terrorist attacks on our soil are. How does this make sense in the name of "sanity" and national security?

_________________
When liberal heads explode, there's not much of a mess to clean up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PV=nRT



Joined: 14 Jun 2012
Posts: 3921

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 6:46 pm    Post subject: Re: And Yet ANOTHER win for santiy Reply with quote

tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
mudslinger47 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
mudslinger47 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
JamieHall wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Basically telling the activist judges that tried to block the ban based solely on political activism to go screw themselves.


So are we back to calling every judge we disagree with an "activist" judge?


They ruled on personal beliefs not the law, one even had a family member who was effected by the ban. So yes he was an activist judge. Obama did the exact same thing and these judges had no problem with it.





When you get a chance, can you explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban. Maybe you can provide a list of domestic terrorist attacks committed by Iranian nationals to Saudi nationals. All in the name of "sanity" of course.


Doesn't make any difference whether you like it or not or who you'd have chosen or not, the fact that the SCOTUS OK'd it is the important part... If the President feels as though he needs to revisit and add more to it, he'll be able to with out any objection.... why do you care? You were against the ban anyway... any port in the storm huh....loser


In other words, you don't have a clue and lack any kind of rational explanation. But then again, you're a trumpkin. Typical. Lol


My apologies, I didn't realize your an idiot and cant read and comprehend..



Paging Ex and Tilley. Your boys need some help. Midge is hiding and Duane is not helping your cause one bit. Explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban, but a bunch of countries who have not carried out terrorist attacks on our soil are. How does this make sense in the name of "sanity" and national security?


Are only Muslim countries singled out?


Why is Saudi Arabia not on this travel ban? You are familiar with 9/11, are you not?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tilley88



Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Posts: 3481

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 7:14 pm    Post subject: Re: And Yet ANOTHER win for santiy Reply with quote

PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
mudslinger47 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
mudslinger47 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
JamieHall wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Basically telling the activist judges that tried to block the ban based solely on political activism to go screw themselves.


So are we back to calling every judge we disagree with an "activist" judge?


They ruled on personal beliefs not the law, one even had a family member who was effected by the ban. So yes he was an activist judge. Obama did the exact same thing and these judges had no problem with it.





When you get a chance, can you explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban. Maybe you can provide a list of domestic terrorist attacks committed by Iranian nationals to Saudi nationals. All in the name of "sanity" of course.


Doesn't make any difference whether you like it or not or who you'd have chosen or not, the fact that the SCOTUS OK'd it is the important part... If the President feels as though he needs to revisit and add more to it, he'll be able to with out any objection.... why do you care? You were against the ban anyway... any port in the storm huh....loser


In other words, you don't have a clue and lack any kind of rational explanation. But then again, you're a trumpkin. Typical. Lol


My apologies, I didn't realize your an idiot and cant read and comprehend..



Paging Ex and Tilley. Your boys need some help. Midge is hiding and Duane is not helping your cause one bit. Explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban, but a bunch of countries who have not carried out terrorist attacks on our soil are. How does this make sense in the name of "sanity" and national security?


Are only Muslim countries singled out?


Why is Saudi Arabia not on this travel ban? You are familiar with 9/11, are you not?


Do they harbor ISIS? Are they the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism? Are they included in the Axis of terror? Are they run by a communist dictator?
_________________
When liberal heads explode, there's not much of a mess to clean up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tilley88



Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Posts: 3481

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 7:19 pm    Post subject: Re: And Yet ANOTHER win for santiy Reply with quote

PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
mudslinger47 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
mudslinger47 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
JamieHall wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Basically telling the activist judges that tried to block the ban based solely on political activism to go screw themselves.


So are we back to calling every judge we disagree with an "activist" judge?


They ruled on personal beliefs not the law, one even had a family member who was effected by the ban. So yes he was an activist judge. Obama did the exact same thing and these judges had no problem with it.





When you get a chance, can you explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban. Maybe you can provide a list of domestic terrorist attacks committed by Iranian nationals to Saudi nationals. All in the name of "sanity" of course.


Doesn't make any difference whether you like it or not or who you'd have chosen or not, the fact that the SCOTUS OK'd it is the important part... If the President feels as though he needs to revisit and add more to it, he'll be able to with out any objection.... why do you care? You were against the ban anyway... any port in the storm huh....loser


In other words, you don't have a clue and lack any kind of rational explanation. But then again, you're a trumpkin. Typical. Lol


My apologies, I didn't realize your an idiot and cant read and comprehend..



Paging Ex and Tilley. Your boys need some help. Midge is hiding and Duane is not helping your cause one bit. Explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban, but a bunch of countries who have not carried out terrorist attacks on our soil are. How does this make sense in the name of "sanity" and national security?


Are only Muslim countries singled out?


Why is Saudi Arabia not on this travel ban? You are familiar with 9/11, are you not?


Do they harbor ISIS? Are they the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism? Are they included in the Axis of terror? Are they run by a communist dictator?
_________________
When liberal heads explode, there's not much of a mess to clean up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PV=nRT



Joined: 14 Jun 2012
Posts: 3921

PostPosted: Thu Jun 28, 2018 7:20 pm    Post subject: Re: And Yet ANOTHER win for santiy Reply with quote

tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
mudslinger47 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
mudslinger47 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
JamieHall wrote:
NeverTrustAMidget wrote:
Basically telling the activist judges that tried to block the ban based solely on political activism to go screw themselves.


So are we back to calling every judge we disagree with an "activist" judge?


They ruled on personal beliefs not the law, one even had a family member who was effected by the ban. So yes he was an activist judge. Obama did the exact same thing and these judges had no problem with it.





When you get a chance, can you explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban. Maybe you can provide a list of domestic terrorist attacks committed by Iranian nationals to Saudi nationals. All in the name of "sanity" of course.


Doesn't make any difference whether you like it or not or who you'd have chosen or not, the fact that the SCOTUS OK'd it is the important part... If the President feels as though he needs to revisit and add more to it, he'll be able to with out any objection.... why do you care? You were against the ban anyway... any port in the storm huh....loser


In other words, you don't have a clue and lack any kind of rational explanation. But then again, you're a trumpkin. Typical. Lol


My apologies, I didn't realize your an idiot and cant read and comprehend..



Paging Ex and Tilley. Your boys need some help. Midge is hiding and Duane is not helping your cause one bit. Explain to us why Saudi Arabia is not part of this travel ban, but a bunch of countries who have not carried out terrorist attacks on our soil are. How does this make sense in the name of "sanity" and national security?


Are only Muslim countries singled out?


Why is Saudi Arabia not on this travel ban? You are familiar with 9/11, are you not?


Do they harbor ISIS? Are they the world’s largest state sponsor of terrorism? Are they included in the Axis of terror? Are they run by a communist dictator?


Absolutely. Wahhabism was founded by the House of Saud, which still rules Saudi Arabia today. This sect of Islam is by far the biggest player when it comes to global terrorism. Al Qaeda, Isis, and Boka Haram are all modern Wahhabists. So I ask you again, why is Saudi Arabia not part of this travel ban?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    midsouthracing.com Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group