midsouthracing.com Forum Index
Comp Cams
Comp Newsletter
Comp Newsletter
Dirty Girl Racewear Dirt Heads Crowley's Ridge Raceway
I-30 New Vision Your Ad
Your Ad George Kell Sign Co. Smileys Racing Products

 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in  Subscribe 
 

Evil
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    midsouthracing.com Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
NeverTrustAMidget



Joined: 06 Oct 2007
Posts: 12390

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 3:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
Did I call it or what? I make a thread specifically addressing comments made by a previous poster, and the first two responses are whatabouts, yabuts, and deflections. I understand the reasoning though, which is to try and redirect the topic.


Are there no democrats in the KKK anymore? What exactly does Unite the Right mean? The religious right? The right wing? The right color? Answer my questions posed above and you may realize I addressed your query before that. I'll not shy away from just rhetoric......


Yes, you politely disagreed with Snapper, that is true. I don't recall you following that up by asking him 15 questions.


That's because I don't disagree with his assessment of the KKK and the left being one and the same. I only disagree with his evil comments. There are few evil people in this world, Hitler, Stalin, and others of that ilk. I don't consider folks who follow a line of thought to be evil, but their leaders could be. Are there republicans in the clan? Probably. Are there democrats in the clan? Probably. How has the clan become tied to the Republican Party exclusively? When did this happen, and who is responsible? That's all I'm asking of you......


What's the Klan's stance on gay marriage?

What's the Klan's stance on immigration?

What's the Klan's stance on Affirmative Action?

How about the travel ban?

What's the Klan's opinion on the "liberal news media"?

Who did David Duke support in the 2016 election?


Your turn


Can ask you the same thing about Islam.
_________________
,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PV=nRT



Joined: 14 Jun 2012
Posts: 2727

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 5:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
Did I call it or what? I make a thread specifically addressing comments made by a previous poster, and the first two responses are whatabouts, yabuts, and deflections. I understand the reasoning though, which is to try and redirect the topic.


Are there no democrats in the KKK anymore? What exactly does Unite the Right mean? The religious right? The right wing? The right color? Answer my questions posed above and you may realize I addressed your query before that. I'll not shy away from just rhetoric......


Yes, you politely disagreed with Snapper, that is true. I don't recall you following that up by asking him 15 questions.


That's because I don't disagree with his assessment of the KKK and the left being one and the same. I only disagree with his evil comments. There are few evil people in this world, Hitler, Stalin, and others of that ilk. I don't consider folks who follow a line of thought to be evil, but their leaders could be. Are there republicans in the clan? Probably. Are there democrats in the clan? Probably. How has the clan become tied to the Republican Party exclusively? When did this happen, and who is responsible? That's all I'm asking of you......


What's the Klan's stance on gay marriage?

What's the Klan's stance on immigration?

What's the Klan's stance on Affirmative Action?

How about the travel ban?

What's the Klan's opinion on the "liberal news media"?

Who did David Duke support in the 2016 election?


Your turn


No, it's still your turn. We can play this answer a question with a question deal all day, especially since you seem to be so fond of it. But I asked first, and what I believe to be legitimate and honest questions. Since you believe yourself to be quite the expert on the parties flipping on racial issues, I was hoping to get legitimate and honest answers. I guess not. But I'm okay with that. I already know the answers. You lies and/or ignorance are not required......



You asked about why the Klan is considered to be mostly conservative idealology and I responded. I'm not wasting 30 minutes looking up the answers to your questions because you' want to play games and redirect from the OP.


Your position is noted. You're not wasting your time because you already know the truth. I apologize for the lies/ignorance comment. I should've waited til after your last response.....


You're obviously hurt, and I understand why. One of your buddies who you are racing to defend has been pushing a "liberals are the evil racists by association of the Klan" narrative, and this weekends events have disproved that. This thread was directed at him, but you and Midge have dutifully stepped in and tried to yabut, whatabout, and deflect from all of that. Your questlions are laughable as I am not wasting my time with a homework assignment from you for something irrelevant to the topic. Sorry.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tilley88



Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Posts: 2585

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 9:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
Did I call it or what? I make a thread specifically addressing comments made by a previous poster, and the first two responses are whatabouts, yabuts, and deflections. I understand the reasoning though, which is to try and redirect the topic.


Are there no democrats in the KKK anymore? What exactly does Unite the Right mean? The religious right? The right wing? The right color? Answer my questions posed above and you may realize I addressed your query before that. I'll not shy away from just rhetoric......


Yes, you politely disagreed with Snapper, that is true. I don't recall you following that up by asking him 15 questions.


That's because I don't disagree with his assessment of the KKK and the left being one and the same. I only disagree with his evil comments. There are few evil people in this world, Hitler, Stalin, and others of that ilk. I don't consider folks who follow a line of thought to be evil, but their leaders could be. Are there republicans in the clan? Probably. Are there democrats in the clan? Probably. How has the clan become tied to the Republican Party exclusively? When did this happen, and who is responsible? That's all I'm asking of you......


What's the Klan's stance on gay marriage?

What's the Klan's stance on immigration?

What's the Klan's stance on Affirmative Action?

How about the travel ban?

What's the Klan's opinion on the "liberal news media"?

Who did David Duke support in the 2016 election?


Your turn


No, it's still your turn. We can play this answer a question with a question deal all day, especially since you seem to be so fond of it. But I asked first, and what I believe to be legitimate and honest questions. Since you believe yourself to be quite the expert on the parties flipping on racial issues, I was hoping to get legitimate and honest answers. I guess not. But I'm okay with that. I already know the answers. You lies and/or ignorance are not required......



You asked about why the Klan is considered to be mostly conservative idealology and I responded. I'm not wasting 30 minutes looking up the answers to your questions because you' want to play games and redirect from the OP.


Your position is noted. You're not wasting your time because you already know the truth. I apologize for the lies/ignorance comment. I should've waited til after your last response.....


You're obviously hurt, and I understand why. One of your buddies who you are racing to defend has been pushing a "liberals are the evil racists by association of the Klan" narrative, and this weekends events have disproved that. This thread was directed at him, but you and Midge have dutifully stepped in and tried to yabut, whatabout, and deflect from all of that. Your questlions are laughable as I am not wasting my time with a homework assignment from you for something irrelevant to the topic. Sorry.


Lol, okay. Snappy is no "buddy", but I do agree with most of what he says. And it's okay if you don't agree with us, or vice versa. I'll not lose any sleep over your feeble attacks on me.
You can carry on like you won, but we know you didn't, and won't. The revisionist history you're pushing won't pass the smell test, now or later. Folks who have been around much longer than you know the truth. But you keep repeating what you learned in that fine school of higher learning and maybe, just maybe, some ignorant 18 year old might fall for your bullsh!t.........
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PV=nRT



Joined: 14 Jun 2012
Posts: 2727

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 11:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
Did I call it or what? I make a thread specifically addressing comments made by a previous poster, and the first two responses are whatabouts, yabuts, and deflections. I understand the reasoning though, which is to try and redirect the topic.


Are there no democrats in the KKK anymore? What exactly does Unite the Right mean? The religious right? The right wing? The right color? Answer my questions posed above and you may realize I addressed your query before that. I'll not shy away from just rhetoric......


Yes, you politely disagreed with Snapper, that is true. I don't recall you following that up by asking him 15 questions.


That's because I don't disagree with his assessment of the KKK and the left being one and the same. I only disagree with his evil comments. There are few evil people in this world, Hitler, Stalin, and others of that ilk. I don't consider folks who follow a line of thought to be evil, but their leaders could be. Are there republicans in the clan? Probably. Are there democrats in the clan? Probably. How has the clan become tied to the Republican Party exclusively? When did this happen, and who is responsible? That's all I'm asking of you......


What's the Klan's stance on gay marriage?

What's the Klan's stance on immigration?

What's the Klan's stance on Affirmative Action?

How about the travel ban?

What's the Klan's opinion on the "liberal news media"?

Who did David Duke support in the 2016 election?


Your turn


No, it's still your turn. We can play this answer a question with a question deal all day, especially since you seem to be so fond of it. But I asked first, and what I believe to be legitimate and honest questions. Since you believe yourself to be quite the expert on the parties flipping on racial issues, I was hoping to get legitimate and honest answers. I guess not. But I'm okay with that. I already know the answers. You lies and/or ignorance are not required......



You asked about why the Klan is considered to be mostly conservative idealology and I responded. I'm not wasting 30 minutes looking up the answers to your questions because you' want to play games and redirect from the OP.


Your position is noted. You're not wasting your time because you already know the truth. I apologize for the lies/ignorance comment. I should've waited til after your last response.....


You're obviously hurt, and I understand why. One of your buddies who you are racing to defend has been pushing a "liberals are the evil racists by association of the Klan" narrative, and this weekends events have disproved that. This thread was directed at him, but you and Midge have dutifully stepped in and tried to yabut, whatabout, and deflect from all of that. Your questlions are laughable as I am not wasting my time with a homework assignment from you for something irrelevant to the topic. Sorry.


Lol, okay. Snappy is no "buddy", but I do agree with most of what he says. And it's okay if you don't agree with us, or vice versa. I'll not lose any sleep over your feeble attacks on me.
You can carry on like you won, but we know you didn't, and won't. The revisionist history you're pushing won't pass the smell test, now or later. Folks who have been around much longer than you know the truth. But you keep repeating what you learned in that fine school of higher learning and maybe, just maybe, some ignorant 18 year old might fall for your bullsh!t.........


Revisionist history? I'm talking about the events of this weekend and you are going back 50 years. LOL. Get some sleep.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mudslinger47



Joined: 27 Apr 2010
Posts: 9690
Location: Central Coast of Ca

PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 11:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Alt-Left kinda prove Snappy out, don't they?
_________________
Wasn't it you liberals that swore the Polls were right?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tilley88



Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Posts: 2585

PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 12:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
tilley88 wrote:
PV=nRT wrote:
Did I call it or what? I make a thread specifically addressing comments made by a previous poster, and the first two responses are whatabouts, yabuts, and deflections. I understand the reasoning though, which is to try and redirect the topic.


Are there no democrats in the KKK anymore? What exactly does Unite the Right mean? The religious right? The right wing? The right color? Answer my questions posed above and you may realize I addressed your query before that. I'll not shy away from just rhetoric......


Yes, you politely disagreed with Snapper, that is true. I don't recall you following that up by asking him 15 questions.


That's because I don't disagree with his assessment of the KKK and the left being one and the same. I only disagree with his evil comments. There are few evil people in this world, Hitler, Stalin, and others of that ilk. I don't consider folks who follow a line of thought to be evil, but their leaders could be. Are there republicans in the clan? Probably. Are there democrats in the clan? Probably. How has the clan become tied to the Republican Party exclusively? When did this happen, and who is responsible? That's all I'm asking of you......


What's the Klan's stance on gay marriage?

What's the Klan's stance on immigration?

What's the Klan's stance on Affirmative Action?

How about the travel ban?

What's the Klan's opinion on the "liberal news media"?

Who did David Duke support in the 2016 election?


Your turn


No, it's still your turn. We can play this answer a question with a question deal all day, especially since you seem to be so fond of it. But I asked first, and what I believe to be legitimate and honest questions. Since you believe yourself to be quite the expert on the parties flipping on racial issues, I was hoping to get legitimate and honest answers. I guess not. But I'm okay with that. I already know the answers. You lies and/or ignorance are not required......



You asked about why the Klan is considered to be mostly conservative idealology and I responded. I'm not wasting 30 minutes looking up the answers to your questions because you' want to play games and redirect from the OP.


Your position is noted. You're not wasting your time because you already know the truth. I apologize for the lies/ignorance comment. I should've waited til after your last response.....


You're obviously hurt, and I understand why. One of your buddies who you are racing to defend has been pushing a "liberals are the evil racists by association of the Klan" narrative, and this weekends events have disproved that. This thread was directed at him, but you and Midge have dutifully stepped in and tried to yabut, whatabout, and deflect from all of that. Your questlions are laughable as I am not wasting my time with a homework assignment from you for something irrelevant to the topic. Sorry.


Lol, okay. Snappy is no "buddy", but I do agree with most of what he says. And it's okay if you don't agree with us, or vice versa. I'll not lose any sleep over your feeble attacks on me.
You can carry on like you won, but we know you didn't, and won't. The revisionist history you're pushing won't pass the smell test, now or later. Folks who have been around much longer than you know the truth. But you keep repeating what you learned in that fine school of higher learning and maybe, just maybe, some ignorant 18 year old might fall for your bullsh!t.........


Revisionist history? I'm talking about the events of this weekend and you are going back 50 years. LOL. Get some sleep.


And you're skewing what happened 50 years ago to try and validate your statements regarding racists and conservatives today. Get a clue.....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PsychoTrack



Joined: 26 Apr 2009
Posts: 11118

PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 1:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I heard trumpski saying something about an alt-left the other day. I've never heard of them. There are groups that identify themselves as alt-right but I know of no alt-left. The alt-right groups got their name from Kellyanne Conway when she said she was offering up "alternative facts." That was her way of admitting that she was lying.
_________________
Common folk embrace religion. Wise ones reject it. Rulers find it useful.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mudslinger47



Joined: 27 Apr 2010
Posts: 9690
Location: Central Coast of Ca

PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2017 9:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PsychoTrack wrote:
I heard trumpski saying something about an alt-left the other day. I've never heard of them. There are groups that identify themselves as alt-right but I know of no alt-left. The alt-right groups got their name from Kellyanne Conway when she said she was offering up "alternative facts." That was her way of admitting that she was lying.


Try thinking for a change , It isn't a stretch if you have an alt-right, you probably have an alt-left.... personally I general refer to them as far left.... and far right.....
_________________
Wasn't it you liberals that swore the Polls were right?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PsychoTrack



Joined: 26 Apr 2009
Posts: 11118

PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2017 1:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You're lying, crapslinger. There is no group or entity that refers to themselves as the alt-left. The claims that there are those that have adopted that moniker are totally false. You're just barking at misdirection and deflection. That's all you have to excuse yourself.
_________________
Common folk embrace religion. Wise ones reject it. Rulers find it useful.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tilley88



Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Posts: 2585

PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

PsychoTrack wrote:
You're lying, crapslinger. There is no group or entity that refers to themselves as the alt-left. The claims that there are those that have adopted that moniker are totally false. You're just barking at misdirection and deflection. That's all you have to excuse yourself.


Who coined the term alt-right?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PsychoTrack



Joined: 26 Apr 2009
Posts: 11118

PostPosted: Sun Aug 20, 2017 9:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are you denying the existence of the alt-right, tillyjo?
_________________
Common folk embrace religion. Wise ones reject it. Rulers find it useful.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tilley88



Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Posts: 2585

PostPosted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 5:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

PsychoTrack wrote:
Are you denying the existence of the alt-right, tillyjo?


Are you sidestepping my question?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PsychoTrack



Joined: 26 Apr 2009
Posts: 11118

PostPosted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 11:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have no clue as to the originator of the term "alt-right", tillyjo, but they are real and they are loud and I still maintain that the moniker is at least akin to the claim from Kellyanne Conway that she was presenting "alternative facts." Just what the heck are any "alternative facts" other than excuses for not telling the truth?" Are you denying the existence of the "alt-right?" I'm denying the existence of any "alt-left" and I will continue to pretty much ignore any claims that an alt-left does exist.
_________________
Common folk embrace religion. Wise ones reject it. Rulers find it useful.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tilley88



Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Posts: 2585

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2017 10:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

PsychoTrack wrote:
I have no clue as to the originator of the term "alt-right", tillyjo, but they are real and they are loud and I still maintain that the moniker is at least akin to the claim from Kellyanne Conway that she was presenting "alternative facts." Just what the heck are any "alternative facts" other than excuses for not telling the truth?" Are you denying the existence of the "alt-right?" I'm denying the existence of any "alt-left" and I will continue to pretty much ignore any claims that an alt-left does exist.


If you deny that the alt-left exists then you must live in an alt-universe. What do you consider Antifa and BLM?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mudslinger47



Joined: 27 Apr 2010
Posts: 9690
Location: Central Coast of Ca

PostPosted: Wed Aug 23, 2017 8:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PsychoTrack wrote:
I have no clue as to the originator of the term "alt-right", tillyjo, but they are real and they are loud and I still maintain that the moniker is at least akin to the claim from Kellyanne Conway that she was presenting "alternative facts." Just what the heck are any "alternative facts" other than excuses for not telling the truth?" Are you denying the existence of the "alt-right?" I'm denying the existence of any "alt-left" and I will continue to pretty much ignore any claims that an alt-left does exist.


Democrat Politicians and the Media coined the phrase Alt-Right..... it stands to reason that if there is an alt right there would be an alt left using the same delineations .... A politician and a media source coined the phrase Alt Left, hence it should stand as well as Alt Right..... Logic always sand the test of time....
_________________
Wasn't it you liberals that swore the Polls were right?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    midsouthracing.com Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group